Monday, December 27, 2010
Innocent
In 1983 Diane and her family were attacked by James Claire Haynes Cheryl was killed, he tried to kill Christie with two gunshots but she survived, Danny also survived but sadly was paralyzed from the waist down. Cheryl and Danny have not seen their real Grandparents since 1983 they were snached by the state away from all family they knew LOVED and needed to help them get through such a tramatic time. I know the public perception is that Diane committed these crimes the strange part is that the public does not want the truth; Is it so hard to believe that the state convicted an innocent person? It happens every day court decisions are being reversed only to find out the prosecutor lied and fabricated evidence. If you are interested in the Truth and have an open mind in finding the truth see http://www.dianedownsisinnocent.com/ this site has amazing court documents that show diane did not commit these crimes and more important could not have committed these crimes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have read and read information about this case, and believe she is not guilty. The system will never fess up to what they have done. The little girl was corosed in her statments. How can they prosecutor end up with custody of the kids???? Something is not right..from what i have read the da had it out for her, she knew too much. Poor grandparents just had everything taken from them...sad case my prayers to you all
ReplyDeletedid you have have any questions I might answer? pass this blog on to our friends
Deletethis post shows the truth
ReplyDeletethank you
After seeing Small Sacrifices I always assumed she was guilty. Even the DA taking custody, I never thought anything of it. Grandparents were available? That poor woman and her family. I had no idea.
ReplyDeleteHi Sirius thank you for the reply, indeed she is not guilty more truth can be found at www.dianedowns.com if you have doubts or concerns just post and I will gladly reply
Deletehave a great new year
James
Youre all idiots. Shes now climing someone she owed money to did it. And she knew who it was. So even if she didnt pull the trugger shes still an accessory and liable for covering for the true killer.
ReplyDeleteI don't think she is a killer I think some one was hire to do this because she owned thin money there was No blood on her or any think if she was so close there would be blood
ReplyDeleteHow do I get into contact with a legal person regarding knowing who got rid of the gun for james?
ReplyDelete